Feature Article
The next time you are meeting with IT Procurement ask them about their savings targets and whether their targets are based on reductions in spend or budget.
It is
often said that, all that IT Buyers care about is savings, but let me lift the
lid on what type of savings they are really after - because not all savings are
weighted equally.
Ideally
IT buyers are looking for Gold - metaphorically - but more often than not they
are finding themselves down a Coal Mine. Let me explain:
A
savings type called COST REDUCTION is the gold, whilst another savings type called COST AVOIDANCE is the coal.
The Gold
(Cost Reduction) can be claimed only - and only if - the company has existing
spend (or budget) for the product that you or your competitor is selling. Gold Savings
happen when this year's spend is less than last year's spend.
This
could be as a result of :
- A switch that is
made from an existing non-preferred supplier to a preferred supplier (you) with
better terms and lower prices.
- A
negotiation leading to a unit price reduction against existing
volume.
-
Demand management leading to a volume
reduction.
It is
possible that Cost Reduction is a large or only contributor to your IT buyer's
savings target that year.
Any
other savings, in the eyes of an IT Buyer, is the lesser valued COST AVOIDANCE
type - The Coal.
In
other words, if you are not working on knocking out a competitor with existing
spend and just want to sell more volume at a slightly reduced price, expand
product ranges or introduce new services, you are "Down the coal
mine" and you will only be seen as offering coal when you make any
concessions in your negotiations.
Concessions
could be:
- The
company wants to buy more product so you are lowering the unit price - a bit -
but the overall spend is still more than last year.
- The
contract says that you are allowed to increase your prices every year by X% and
you are allowing for the price to stay the same as last year.
Before
making any of these types of concessions make sure that you have established
whether they add any value towards the IT buyer's target or not. They
might actually prefer other contractual improvements and concessions.
Two
warnings:
If you
are bidding in an RFP (Request for Proposal) and the product is a new offering
then you are always going "Down the coal mine" because there is no
previous spend. There is nothing you or the IT Buyer can do about that and you
might have to make more concessions than normal in order to win the business in
the first place. Assuming you won the business, then when your contract renews
you are back at creating savings of the Gold and Coal variety.
Finally,
the whole activity of establishing savings definitions and the savings
calculation methodology is serious business in Corporates. This is a complex
area and not far from a Black Art. The examples above are a simple explanation
in order to create awareness.
If you
want to check how I would see a concession in terms of savings, feel free to
email me at wanda@amycus.com to get my opinion.
To your
success
Wanda
Note from Wanda
After 20 years in IT Procurement, having managed an annual
Software spend of close to £450million, I have decided to jump the fence.
I now add
value to Sales Teams when they are planning and executing deals, by being able
to virtually read your buyer's mind and advising you on the best strategy to
take during your negotiations.
Do
please give me feedback on what you think of my Newsletter and what topics you
want to see covered next, by contacting me at wanda@amycus.com. |