Searching for a new job was never easy. I am old enough to remember when the predominant way individuals looked for “posted” openings was through the newspaper “Want
Ads.” As time has moved on the process moved from the newspapers, to the internet and online posting sites. Computer technology getting more sophisticated led to the development of online application templates, to computer screening of applicants, to where now tools are provided to applicants to assist them in the writing of their resumes and various job search support tools.
Through all iterations, connecting to job opportunities through “someone you know” or that a friend or a family member may know of has always been there. While having also always being there, in more recent time tapping into one’s professional network, (particularly with the advent of such professional social media tools as Linked In) has also been a method of looking to get your credentials in front of those who may need your
talents.
A job search is not just preparing or updating your resume, making sure that you like the document that has been produced, and then using it to apply to every job opening that you see for which you may be remotely qualified. Yet that is still what a lot of searchers do. Even those who will say, I only look to apply for roles for which I have the qualifications, and then sit back and wait for a call back from the company to which they applied, are still not necessarily
searching for jobs.
There are 4 overall broad categories in finding a job when you are in job search. The most popularly utilized of the methods, (and the one that likely has the lowest success rate), is posting for jobs through postings which today originate online. This method historically has had a success rate for applicants of between 1 to 10 percent. The reason for such a low response rate is many. First, you are often applying
as an “unknown” to the company. There are dozens to hundreds of individuals who may be applying for the same job role. The job description may point out the duties of the job, but it does not necessarily bring through the “feelings” of the area in that company that is hiring, and just what they may be looking for in a candidate.
The 2nd method used, which is recruiters or staffing agencies has a similar success rate as the online applying. There is more of a personal connection level involved with this approach. If the recruiter is one with strong connections to the companies they serve, or internal recruiters who are part of talent acquisition for a particular organization, they can add value to your search. Such recruiters get to know the tendencies of hiring managers in the
companies they serve. They also can tell from the strengths (and weaknesses) that a candidate has, what a hiring company may like about the candidate, but also what may be a concern for them. Many times, such recruiters can help prepare a candidate for an upcoming interview in a company by knowing the people for whom they are doing staffing, so well.
However, not all recruiters are created equal. If the recruiter is not a specialist in the discipline you are seeking to find work, they may take you on as a client, but may only infrequently receive openings that align with your skills and specialties. If the recruiter is not a “retained” recruiter by an organization, or if they are not on the company’s talent acquisition staff, they are at best only trying to
put candidates in front of companies with listed openings without any guarantee of success. Often such recruiters may submit you for roles that you are not even remotely qualified for, and as such will be indicating they are working for you, but doing so with little possible return on your investment.
That is why the last two methods of search, networking, and direct contact have statistically shown to have the best chance of success for those in job search. Do these two methods always work? No, they do not. However, what advantages do they have over just “posting blindly” online for jobs or working through recruiters?
Among the advantages of networking and direct contact are that you are already looking to connect with other professionals. If those individuals are people working inside of a company which is hiring, and they have worked with you in the past, they may very well be an advocate as to why you are a candidate the hiring manager may want to speak to. An inside advocate can provide your resume to the hiring manager directly. Therefore, if you have not
gotten past electronic screening mechanisms which are used by the Human Resources Department, this is another way for you to be seen. Connecting directly, you get an understanding of the culture of a particular company, and if indeed are they a good fit for you. Often there can be other openings in a company that are not posted. In catching an organization at such a time, you can possibly be the answer to their needs without having to go through the formal Human Resources
Department. (Yes, in larger companies this may be frowned upon, and the job may have to be posted anyway. However, in medium or smaller companies, such approaches may not be mandatory and can give you an opportunity that you might not have had if you were waiting for a posted opening).
Therefore, if you find yourself in job search, (whether through the choice that you have been let go from your previous job role, or are looking on your own while employed), remember “The Wildcard” in the search process is not just what is posted by you on your resume, on your Linked In profile, on a Biography of yourself etc., it is the personality, bias and needs of the reader and needer of your services and talents that you need to consider. As such,
whether your communication is created by the computer tools of today, a professional writer or you developing them yourself, your success rate in getting to the point of the interview will be through the efforts and strategies you put into connecting with the decision makers at companies that need your service.
Will that guarantee that you will be the candidate hired on the spot? Not necessarily. However, that is a conversation for another day.
|