What's at stake if Canada moves forward with Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID)?
There has been much debate in the press, legal circles, and in communities across Canada over whether Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) should be made available to vulnerable populations
like minors and people with mental health issues. As human beings, it is our duty to examine recent developments such as advancements in mental health care and shifts in global morality before making a decision on this critical issue.
Stand Up and Prevent State Sanctioned Murder
Allowing the Government to take the lives of minors and those with mental illness can be described as something akin to the atrocities committed by the Nazis during the Holocaust. Just as
Nazi Germany attempted to systematically eliminate certain groups of people deemed “undesirable” or “inferior”, so too would permitting MAID for minors run contrary to a fundamental tenet of our society: the protection of life and its preservation.
200,000 Killed Under the Nazis' Aktion "T4"
The Nazi Euthanasia Program, codenamed Aktion "T4," was a brutal and systematic campaign of murder against institutionalized people with disabilities, mental illness and other
perceived deficiencies. This mass killing effort was initiated by Adolf Hitler in 1939 and involved the forced euthanization of over 200,000 individuals deemed to be a burden on the German nation.
Conclusion
In light of this dark chapter in human history, it is essential that we consider all potential consequences of expanding access to MAID services before deciding on a course of action, especially when it comes to vulnerable populations like minors and people
with mental illnesses. By doing so, we can ensure that no similar atrocities happen ever again.
Key Takeaways
• Debate has ensued over whether Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) should be made available to vulnerable populations like minors and people with mental health issues.
• Allowing the Government to take the lives of minors and those with mental illness is contrary to a fundamental tenet of our society: the protection of life and its
preservation.
• The Nazi Euthanasia Program, codenamed Aktion "T4," was a brutal and systematic campaign of murder against institutionalized people with disabilities, mental illness and other perceived deficiencies which resulted in 200,000 deaths.
• It is essential to consider all potential consequences of expanding access to MAID services before deciding on a course of action, especially when it comes to vulnerable populations like minors and people with mental
illnesses.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are euthanasia and eugenics programs?
Euthanasia is the practice of deliberately ending a person’s life in order to relieve pain and suffering. It can take place in different ways, including lethal injection, withholding of medical treatment or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments such as food and water. Euthanasia is often used when a patient has an incurable and painful condition and wishes to
die with dignity.
Eugenics is the practice of deliberately selecting for traits that are deemed desirable in a population, usually through selective breeding or sterilization. It has often been associated with racism and discrimination, as it was used by Nazi Germany to create a “master race” of people who were deemed superior to those of other races or religions. The practice has been largely discredited since then due to its abuses and unethical nature, but it is still used in some
countries as a way to reduce the number of people with genetic disorders or intellectual disabilities.
Both euthanasia and eugenics programs can raise ethical concerns, especially when they are used as part of a larger social agenda.
What is non-voluntary euthanasia?
Non-voluntary euthanasia is when a person cannot say yes or no to ending their life. This could happen if the person is in a coma or too young to understand what is happening. The proponents of
MAID want to include these groups in its services.
Is the Canadian Government trying to save money through Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID)?
Yes, the Canadian Government is trying to save money by offering MAID to its citizens. It costs less to offer MAID than providing long-term care for someone with a debilitating condition.
Are the low socio-economic classes a burden to Canadian Society?
Yes, the Canadian Government considers
these people to be a burden on society. This is why they are exploring the use of MAID as an alternative form of care for the economically disadvantaged.
With abortion and euthanasia so readily available, what are the ramifications for the sanctity of life?
The availability of abortion and euthanasia raises ethical questions about the value of human life. It could lead to a devaluation of life, as these procedures both involve taking someone’s life in order to relieve suffering or end an unwanted
pregnancy. This can potentially have negative implications for our society, as it may lead to an increase in disregard for human life and the loss of respect for its inherent value. Additionally, it could lead to a slippery slope where other forms of taking life are made more accepted or even commonplace. It is important to consider all potential consequences before deciding on a course of action when it comes to these sensitive issues.
Have any other countries used euthanasia and
eugenics besides the Nazis?
Yes, other countries have used euthanasia and eugenics. In the 1970s, Belgium legalized euthanasia for adults with serious illnesses. And in India, the government has pursued a controversial policy of forced sterilization to control the population growth rate. Additionally, China is known for allowing selective abortion based on gender preference. All of these policies are considered forms of eugenics, which is the practice of attempting to improve the
quality of a population by selectively breeding or eliminating certain types of people. Additionally, countries such as Imperial Japan during World War II and the Soviet Union during its rule that utilized state-mandated euthanasia are a stark reminder that governments can use these programs to threaten vulnerable populations, while taking away their right to consent and protection of life.
Are euthanasia and eugenics programs effective?
Euthanasia and eugenics
programs are controversial, as they can be used in unethical ways. Research into the effectiveness of these practices is limited and inconclusive. Studies show that euthanasia may help to reduce suffering for those who are terminally ill, but other studies suggest this could lead to abuse or coercion of vulnerable populations. Eugenics programs have been found to be ineffective in producing healthier, more intelligent populations. Furthermore, these programs can lead to discrimination or
violation of human rights as they are based on prejudices and assumptions about certain groups of people. For these reasons, many countries do not allow euthanasia or eugenics programs and consider them unethical practices that should not be supported.
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as professional, legal, or medical advice. It is important to speak to a qualified professional before making any decisions related
to euthanasia or eugenics programs.
Contact Us
Please feel free to contact us if you have any specific topics in mind that you would like us to cover! We hope to provide you with the most up-to-date information, news, and resources to help prepare you for whatever lies ahead in
our increasingly uncertain world. The threats of war, economic collapse and complete societal breakdown have never been closer than they are now, and it is our responsibility to ensure that we are prepared for whatever eventuality may come. Stay vigilant and stay safe- the future is in our hands.
