Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez sought professional advice in 2015 when he became concerned about the electromagnetic fields (EMF) that surrounded us in our NYC offices and home. He wanted to know the truth so he turned to Camilla Rees, an expert in the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields (see full bio below). Camilla quickly became a good friend to Nick and me, and I’d like to share her expertise on 5G.

 

 

According to Camilla Rees, “several of the 'promises' of 5G technology have been called into serious question, and much of what we hear about 5G wonders is considered hype. There is even an online promotion circulating suggesting 5G will 'cure cancer', when the radiation emitted by the coming 5G (and 4G) antennas densely placed throughout neighborhoods in very large numbers instead will greatly increase cancer and other serious diseases. Some Wall Street investment analysts, as well, are questioning whether the enormous costs to build out this new network, hundreds of billions of dollars a year, can be financially justified.

 

At present, spectrum for 5G has not been finalized. The 5G network has not been built out. Limited 5G testing in lower frequency bands is going on in some cities. In some cases, results have been disappointing.

 

The biggest risk at this time is from 4G antennas being rapidly placed on utility poles and other infrastructure near homes that transmit 24/7. 4G and 5G antennas will work in tandem. 4G is needed for location identification of wireless devices for 5G's 'on demand' transmissions, as well as for voice calls. 5G is only for data.  Phones enabled for 5G will still use 4G for voice. As explained in the Building Biology Institute's new 5G course, 90% of cellular data is expected to transmit via 4G LTE for years to come.

 

Some believe the rush to hype 5G even before 5G technologies are fully developed or standardized is a trojan horse, that effectively brings 4G closer to homes without the difficulty and cost of obtaining permissions required for cell towers, while at the same time staking claim to muni 'real estate' for 5G later on if and when the 5G network is built out in a given location.

 

Describing the 4G risks here first is not to discount the importance of the additional new risks from 5G technologies that will become a reality when developed and deployed, including: Super-20 GHz exposures, with much higher and more biologically disruptive frequencies, in some cases going into the millimeter band; new signaling characteristics, like 'beamforming', that greatly concentrates radiation exposures into narrow, high intensity beams (that is also now being added to 4G); and industry's aspiration for 'network virtualization', where antennas are in constant communication with each other, and optimized using artificial intelligence.

 

For now, the sheer number of radiating antennas being installed in close proximity to homes should be alarming to us all. So, too, should the fact that there exists far superior and much safer communications technology that is not being deployed (Fiber To The Premises, or FTTP), as described last year in National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy's "Re-Inventing Wires: The Future of Landlines and Networks". And, finally, of great concern is the fact that the U.S. government has known for well over a half a century that Radio Frequency Radiation emitted by wireless antennas and devices is linked to many diseases, including cancer, including from their own research. Yet it has enabled the growth of the wireless industry to its present multi-trillion dollar size, and is now facilitating 4G/5G antenna densification, greatly escalating biological and health risks to humans, animals and Nature, while, importantly, eliminating local government control.”

 

Pretty scary, right? Camilla Rees and I strongly encourage you to study up and learn everything you can about the risks of '4G/5G antenna densification'.

 

 

WHY ATTEND? In a February 2019 US Senate hearing, the wireless industry was forced to admit they have no safety studies on 5G, and don't plan to do any.  Meanwhile, there are thousands of independent studies concluding that wireless radiation causes biological harm. Despite this, the wireless industry is working with government to deploy 5G -- it's a global, for-profit, human experiment... without our consent.  

 

What does it mean? 5G is a higher frequency, therefore it travels shorter distances than our current wireless signals, therefore exponentially more transmission devices must be installed to provide connectivity -- millions more, in fact, on lamp posts, telephone poles and other "rights-of-way" for existing utilities. Each tower will emit radiation at levels known to cause cancer, sterility, DNA damage and other harm... especially to our children, who are most at risk.  

 

●    5G defined: research, facts and awareness

●    Science about the dangers of 5G and EMF radiation

●    Sources of wireless radiation and "dirty electricity" in your home

●    Link between 5G, Al and global surveillance

●    How groups and individuals are successfully opposing 5G

●    Simple, empowering actions you can take, here and now

●    Individual solutions and safer, revolutionary technologies

 

 

In the meantime, visit our foundation website to learn more from Camilla Rees on this important subject.

 

To Your Health,

Mary Beth Gonzalez

Founder and President, The Nicholas Gonzalez Foundation