Trump Time?

Published: Fri, 06/19/15

Richardcyoung.com Incite-full
 

In This Issue:
Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Ad

Sign up to get the letter emailed directly to you by clicking here!
 
The Least Credible Populist in History vs. Milton Friedman
 

hillary clinton and milton friedmanThe Least Credible Populist in History vs. Milton Friedman

On Roosevelt Island, NYC, Hillary Clinton kicked off her presidential campaign focusing on income inequality with promises of paid family leave, universal preschool and essentially “free” student loans, as she runs on a platform to the left of even President Obama. But with seven years of historically slow economic growth and stagnant incomes behind us, read here how Ms. Clinton would justify four more years of same.

Hillary, who has lived on speaking fees from Goldman Sachs and donations to her foundation from Qatar, said in her speech:

The financial industry and many multinational corporations have created huge wealth for a few by focusing too much on short-term profit and too little on long-term value—too much on complex trading schemes and stock buybacks, too little on investments in new businesses, jobs and fair compensation.

Here is how economist Milton Freidman, in an interview in 1979, explained capitalism and greed:

Is there some society you know that doesn’t run on greed? … What is greed? Of course none of us are greedy. It’s only the other fellow who’s greedy.

The great achievements of civilization have not come from government bureaus. Einstein didn’t construct his theory under order from a bureaucrat. Henry Ford didn’t revolutionize the automobile industry that way.

… the record of history is absolutely crystal clear that there is no alternative way, so far discovered, of improving the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are unleashed by a free enterprise system.

Read more from Mr. Freidman in the WSJ’s Notable & Quotable here.

Socialism vs Capitalism

>> read more
 
The Worst President in American History, Part IV
 

Vickers_machine_gun_crew_with_gas_masksIn Wilson’s War, historian Jim Powell recounts:

By the end of 1917, Western Europe had been embroiled in war for three years, but it was deadlocked. The United States was still on the sidelines.

All (Allied Powers) had suffered horrendous losses. Neither side was able to achieve decisive victory and dictate surrender terms to the other.


Numerical superiority was no assurance of victory, because both sides had incompetent generals who squandered their resources, especially millions of young men.

Russia was disintegrating and more and more Russians wanted to get out of the war. A settlement with Russia would enable Germany to move soldiers from the Eastern Front to the west- though Germany would still have to keep about a million soldiers in the east as an occupying force.

As historian David Kennedy explained. “The machine hugely amplified the firepower of stationary forces and thereby conferred nearly insuperable advantages on the defense. Its withering fire consumed attacking troops wholesale, forcing the fighting on the Western Front into a grisly deadlock. In the face of such awesome implements of slaughter, 10 million men perished; another 20 million were maimed.”

WWI Maichinegun

>> read more
 
How to Buy a Boat: Part I
 
Mattapoisett Harbor

You know the saying: The two best days for a boat owner are the day he buys it and the day he sells it.

Well I bought a boat a few years ago and it was the best day. So I thought I’d share with you the process I went through to get there and hopefully help you in your own search for a boat.

The first thing you need to do is decide that you want a boat.

I grew up in Mattapoisett, MA which is a small town on the water near Cape Cod. To know where Mattapoisett is imagine looking down on Cape Cod from the air—Mattapoisett is the armpit. It’s a real pretty town right on Buzzard’s Bay.

We owned (still own) a 30-foot sailboat, an O’Day Intrepid 9 meter, named Sunset.

My family would cruise Buzzard’s Bay and spend weekends in different ports. It was fun bringing friends and exploring with the dinghy—getting a taste of what freedom felt like.

As I write this for you, I can’t help but think about some of the funny stories we had from those trips. Here’s one I’m laughing about:

One weekend I brought a friend with me and we were all in the little 9 foot Boston Whaler. I think we decided to stop and have lunch so my dad asked my friend to throw the anchor over. And so he did. And because we were still drifting so my dad asked him to tie it off. My friend said “Sure, with what?”  Turns out he threw the anchor and the line overboard. Thankfully the water wasn’t too deep and we were able to get in the water and bring it up.

So the first piece of advice is to make sure you’re ready to own a boat. I’ll have more for you soon.

>> read more
 
Who Has Putin’s Ear?
 

marine le pen 2012A recent issue of World Affairs Journal explains to readers who philosopher and political activist Alexander Dugin is.

 

(Alexander Dugin) is the intellectual who has Vladimir Putin’s back in the emerging ideological conflict between Russia and the West. At home, Putin uses him to create a nationalist [RCY: much like Marine Le Pen in France here and here], anti-liberal voting bloc, while abroad Dugin is the lynchpin of numerous irregular networks of anti-liberal political resistance and sabotage. No individual better represents the tactics of the current Russian regime. … For Dugin, the ideal basis for individuals and societies is tradition, so history must therefore be the history of tradition, with politics in a secondary role.

 

 

>> read more
 
Rand Paul #1, Part II
 

taking a stand imgIn his best seller Taking a Stand, Rand Paul explains how he would deal with the Middle East specifically and, in general, our porous border.

As complicated as the Middle East is, our role should not be that hard to figure out. All we have to do is to stay true to who we are: a country with compassion, resolve, and the strength to put fear in the hearts of those who hate us.

Eliminate all student visas from countries with fighters in ISIS until we can thoroughly check the backgrounds of those who wish to enter.

wtc-collapse-1A program that George W. Bush started and Obama ended, The National Entry Recognition System (NSEERS), provided extra scrutiny of people traveling to the United States from countries that are hosts to radical Islamic movements. I would reinstitute that program.

For the foreseeable future that would mean fewer student visas until we can get a handle on who is visiting, where they are going, and when they leave. It would also mean much more scrutiny of international travelers and much less hassling of domestic travelers.

9-11-01-twin-towersOur border is porous, and rather than acting to secure and protect it, the administration uses unconstitutional executive action legalizing millions of illegal immigrants. I will oppose and will continue to oppose this unlawful usurpation of power.

The administration’s policy of student visas requires a full-scale reexamination. Recently it was estimated that as many as six thousand students are unaccounted for. Let’s not forget that the 9/11 hijackers were here on lapsed Saudi student visas. How can we allow this loophole to remain open? This is outrageous, and I have fought the administration on it almost as long as I’ve been in the Senate. I proposed legislation that would pressure the Department of Homeland Security to finally follow through on the broken promise of a secure border and an effective visa tracking system.

>> read more
 
A Fair and Flat Tax
 

The U.S. tax code has grown so corrupt, complicated, intrusive and antigrowth that the system isn’t fixable, writes Senator Rand Paul in the WSJ. Presidential hopeful Paul would “blow up” the entire 70,000-page IRS tax code and replace it with a low, broad-based tax of 14.5% on individuals and businesses. Also eliminated would be special interest loopholes, along with payroll tax on workers, gift and estate taxes, telephone taxes and all duties and tariffs.

With income inequality and “fairness” a growing concern for many Americans, Rand Paul has an “All-American solution: Everyone plays by the same rules. This means no one of privilege, wealth or with an arsenal of lobbyists can game the system to pay a lower rate than working Americans.”

A smarter tax system would turbocharge the economy and help America out of its slow-growth path of the past decade. “Even Mr. Obama’s economic advisers tell him that the U.S. corporate tax code, which has the highest rates in the world (35%), is an economic drag,” writes Mr. Paul.

Rand Paul, who has been consulting with Arthur Laffer and the Heritage Foundation’s Stephen Moore and, recognizes that a big challenge to his plan will be overcoming special-interest groups in Washington who will fight hard to save corporate welfare. A flat tax is surprisingly popular with voters for its simplicity and capacity to boost the economy, but will be met with hostility by crony capitalists and lobbyists.

Rand Paul also pledges, as president, to balance the budget. Read more here from Sen. Paul on why his Fair and Flat Tax plan would eliminate the rot in America’s system, restore fairness to all taxpayers, and be an “economic steroid injection.”

>> read more
 
Dick Young’s Save Your Life Books, Part #2
 

Most-Effective-Natural-Cures coverIn The Most Effective Natural Cures on Earth, Jonny Bowden, Ph.D., C.N.S. highlights turmeric for fighting inflammation.

A broad swathe of health industry professionals are convinced that the spice turmeric has anticancer activity. “It helps support liver health, and is a powerful antioxidant,” writes Johnny. Moreover, “the one property of turmeric that stands out—and may even help support its other healthful activities—is its enormous power as an anti-inflammatory.”
 

The family of compounds thought to be responsible for turmeric’s medicinal effects are curcuminoids, which are also responsible for giving turmeric its bright yellow color. The curcuminoids are believed to be responsible for turmeric’s phenomenal anti-inflammatory properties. The most studied of he curcuminoids is curcumin. In one study, curcumin was found to be virtually as effective as he anti-inflammatory medication phenylbutazone.

tumeric new chapterDebbie and I rely upon New Chapter’s organic Turmeric Force.
One whole foods, soft-gel equals 400 mgs of turmeric.





 

>> read more
 
Navy SEAL Sniper School: Part III
 

How hard is Navy Seal Sniper School? Hard. In this article former Navy SEAL sniper head instructor Brandon Webb explains that you get instant cred just by getting into the school. I first read Webb’s description of sniper school in his New York Times bestseller, The Red Circle. Here Brandon talks about having a mental edge:

Once we got camped out and settled in the instruction began, starting with classes on stealth and movement. We learned how to use natural vegetation to our advantage, especially in outfitting our ghillie suits.

The ghillie suit traces back to the Scottish Highlanders who served in the British Army in World War I as Lovat Scouts, forerunners of the modern sniper. Many of these men had been gamekeepers in civilian life, often called ghillies (from the Gaelic term for servant, as they served as hunt guides for the wealthy), where they had cultivated the art of weaving bits and pieces of local flora into their loose-fitting robes to help them blend into their surroundings. Their unique skills were later taught at the British Army sniper schools, which were attended by Americans once the United States entered the war.

For our ghillie suits we started out with a base outfit with a neutral desert pattern, then took scraps of vegetation growing in our immediate environment and clipped these onto our suits. We also used scraps of burlap in different shades, which we learned to vary depending on the specific environment in which we’d be stalking. This sounds simple, but it is amazing to see the degree to which this art can be perfected. When you look at a photo of a Navy SEAL sniper in a ghillie suit out in his environment, it’s almost like those “hidden pictures” you may have pored over as a child: you look and look, and all you can see are trees and bushes. The sniper completely disappears.

They taught us how to make a veg fan, clipping branches from Manzanita bushes or whatever happened to be around and zip tying them together. We learned to hide behind this ad hoc camouflage as we would slowly rise up in the middle of the bushes, eyes just peeking over the top of the fan, using either our binos or the naked eye to peer through the veg clippings and get an idea of where our target was, then slowly melting back down again.

They taught us how to use what they called dead space, which proved to be one of our most important lessons. Imagine standing on the street, next to a car at the curb. If someone is looking in your direction from the sidewalk and you crouch down below the back of the car, suddenly you disappear. You’re using the dead space of the car to cover your signature. You can do the same thing with bushes, boulders, even a few feet of rising or sinking elevation, like a dirt mound or shallow ditch—anything you can put between you and your target.

The terrain in Niland didn’t provide much in the way of natural cover. It’s pretty flat, desolate scenery. But even there in that cracked-earth desert, you can find dead space if you look for it. There are tumbleweeds and other desert bushes, slight dips and rises in elevation, rocks here and there, even an occasional scraggly tree. Find even a little gully, and if you can slip down in there, you’ve got dead space.

They also taught us how to camouflage our rifles when setting up in our final firing position (FFP), and how to make sure we had cleared the muzzle by tamping down the firing area or using veg clippers to clip away vegetation surrounding the muzzle, so that when we took that shot, the pressure wave wouldn’t cause any movement in nearby trees or grass. The last thing you want to do is take a shot and have it create a big signature. Even if you are completely hidden and unseen when you take the shot, if someone whips around and looks to see where that sound came from and they see some grasses swaying or branches moving, they might make your position and nail you.

We also practiced building hide sites. We would dig into the ground, sometimes using mesh or chicken wire we’d brought with us, but mostly using whatever natural terrain we might find on-site. It was almost like becoming a burrowing animal. In the desert, especially, it provides not only cover but also a bit of relief from the intense heat. If you build it right, someone can be standing right next to you and never even realize you’re there. And you might have four guys living in this thing for days on end, watching the target, radioing back to base until they give you authority to take the shot.

This skill would prove extremely useful in the mountains of Afghanistan, as I would discover before long.

Then we started practicing in stalking drills. To give you a sense of the experience, I’ll describe a stalking drill:

They take you out to some location out in the desert and say, “Okay, your target is roughly two to four kilometers in that direction. You’ve got two hours to get to within 180 to 220 yards of the target, set up, and take your shot.”

Off you go, crawling on your belly, you and your gun and your drag bag, which you’ve hooked to your belt at your crotch and now drag along behind you, inching along in the sweltering heat. A half hour goes by, then an hour. Some guys around you go to the bathroom in their ghillie suits. What else are they going to do? You can’t stand up, that’s for damn sure. You have to get within that range—and you aren’t allowed to use laser rangefinders, so you have to use your scope to measure your target and then figure out exactly what point you have to reach in order to be within about two hundred yards.

Two instructors are waiting for you in the command tower, scouring the area with their high-powered binos, looking for you and communicating by radio with three or four walkers on the ground. The walkers are instructors who walk the field; they are not there to hunt you but to act essentially like robots, carrying out commands from the tower. If an instructor detects movement, he’ll radio the walker who is nearest to that spot and say, “Hey Eric, I’ve got movement, I need you to run twenty meters to the right … okay, stop, left face, now take three steps forward, stop. Stalker at your feet.” If that walker is standing right next to you, he says, “Roger that,” and you’re busted. You’ve failed the stalk.

The whole idea is to make this as difficult as possible. By the time you are in firing position, you’re only about 200 yards from the tower. You’re up against two trained sniper instructors who know exactly what direction you’re coming from, know exactly what area you have to set up in, and have not only high-powered binos but also a laser rangefinder. They know you’re coming and would love nothing more than to bust you.

If you’ve made it this far, now comes the moment of painstaking patience, as you slowly pull out your gun, then pull out your scope, and get everything into place. You can’t let your scope give off any kind of reflection or glint of sunlight, so you might cover it with fine mesh, then slowly move into position, get your sight positioned on the target, and squeeze off your shot.

For that first shot, you shoot a blank, which essentially announces that you have made it to your FFP. The walker approaches to within three feet of you, then signals the two instructors in the tower that he is in your vicinity. The instructors take a look, peering in your direction with their high-powered binos. If they see you, you fail. If they aren’t able to see you, then they get on the radio to the walker and say, “Okay, give him his bullet.”

Now they turn away for a moment, so they can’t see the walker come up and hand you your live cartridge. They set up a target right where they had been sitting moments earlier, and clear out. Now you take your shot and hit the target … you hope.

There’s a lot that can go wrong. If your bullet path isn’t completely clear and your bullet even lightly grazes a small twig or branch as it hurtles through the air, that can easily be enough to throw its trajectory off and result in a complete miss. And you’re lying down, remember: there might be a small mound of dirt in the way that you hadn’t noticed.

If you do everything right and hit that target on the chest or the head, you score a ten. Hit just anywhere else inside the silhouette, and you score a nine; just hitting the target scores you an eight. Miss, and you’ve earned a zero.

Then you get up, walk back to the truck, and wait for everyone else. And by the way, after you take that shot you better not leave a trace. We had guys who stalked all the way into position and got off a very decent shot, but then left behind a piece of brass, a zip tie, or a veg clipper—and failed the stalk. You can’t get cocky.

We started doing several stalks a day, a long one (two to four kilometers, which might take four hours or more) in the morning, and then a shorter one-kilometer stalk (about two hours) in the evening. The heat of the day, thank God, was set aside for classes. As with our shooting work up in Coalinga, we would practice for a few days and then be tested.

My first stalk, I ran out of time before I even got to my FFP. It was humiliating. Missing the shot would have been bad enough. I didn’t even get to take the shot. I made up my mind right then and there, that was not going to happen again.

I quickly learned that the first priority was to get eyes on the target. Once you have eyes on the target, then you own it: you know exactly where the enemy is, but he doesn’t know where you are. From that vantage point, you can set about planning your exact route to your FFP.

Jack Niklaus, the legendary championship golfer, used to say that when you’re making a difficult shot, 50 percent of it is the mental picture you create, 40 percent is how you set it up, and 10 percent is the swing itself. In that respect, sniping is a lot like golf: 90 percent of it is how you see the picture and get your shot lined up.

I realized that a lot of the other guys were getting down on the ground and just taking off, crawling in the general direction of the tower without first having gotten eyes on the target. As a consequence, they wouldn’t really know exactly where it was they were going, and they would run out of time … just like I did.

For my second stalk I figured, “Hey, this is practice—let’s push the limits and see what happens.”

Instead of getting down on the ground, I set off in a bold stride in the direction the instructors had told us the target was located. I passed guys who were crawling on their bellies on the hot Niland ground, slowly and painfully, and they looked up at me bug-eyed, with expressions that said, My God, what the hell are you doing?! I figured there was no way the instructors would see me; I was still almost half a mile away, and besides, they wouldn’t be really looking yet, because they wouldn’t be expecting any of us to start getting close nearly that soon.

I kept going until I had eyes on the target—and then immediately got down into a low crouch and started checking out every detail about the terrain between me and the target. Once I had my route planned, I got down on my belly and started crawling the 300 yards or so I still needed to cover in order to get to my FFP. Moving as quickly and as stealthily as I could, it took me maybe thirty minutes to low-crawl into position, set up my firing point, get everything dialed in, and go.

From that point on, it started to click for me. I would find a little high ground, make sure I had eyes on the target, and as soon as I knew exactly where it was, I would map out my approach, put a big terrain feature between me and them, and then I’d just walk right up on them. I started taking down tens, perfect stalks every time.

It drove some of the guys nuts that I caught on so fast, especially those who had come from the country and grown up hunting. There was one guy from Alabama who had spent his whole life hunting in the woods and who was beside himself that I was cleaning his clock. How the hell was this California surfer kid who’d never hunted a day in his life out-stalking them?!

Again, I think it was all the time I spent spear-fishing. The thing that clicked for me was the concept of dead space. That was the key to these stalking exercises. Put that dead space between you and your target, and you can literally run up to them without them ever knowing you’re there. Although you could hardly come up with a greater contrast in environments than underwater versus the Niland desert, that didn’t matter. The concept was exactly the same: find the dead space and use it.

People often assume that sniper stalking is all about getting down on your belly and crawling along incredibly slowly. Yes, that’s part of it—but the greater part of it is strategic. It’s a very mental process.

Sniper Training School

>> read more
 
Napoleon’s “Incomprehensible Day”
 

Meissonier_NapoleonOn the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Waterloo, Andrew Roberts in Smithsonian magazine writes on why Napoleon deserved to lose. But the benefits to European civilization would have been inestimable if Napoleon had defeated Wellington and remained emperor for six more years.

Many across Europe were eager to see the French arrive during the Napoleonic years. Jews, Protestants, and capitalists had a chance to express opinions, to conduct business, and to be pretty much left alone.

The reactionary Holy Alliance of Russia, Prussia and Austria would not have been able to crush liberal constitutionalist movements in Spain, Greece, Eastern Europe and elsewhere; pressure to join France in abolishing slavery in Asia, Africa and the Caribbean would have grown; the benefits of meritocracy over feudalism would have had time to become more widely appreciated; Jews would not have been forced back into their ghettos in the Papal States and made to wear the yellow star again; encouragement of the arts and sciences would have been better understood and copied; and the plans to rebuild Paris would have been implemented, making it the most gorgeous city in the world.

Read more from the WSJ’s Notable & Quotable here.

>> read more
 
Trump Time?
 

Absolutely!

Americans will want to hear what Donald Trump has to say about an open border policy that has brought to the coast of Maine the Somalian horde Americans horrifyingly saw portrayed in Black Hawk Down. Mr. Trump will be able to speak on the scourge that is MS 13. How have any of these emergency room clogging, cutthroats been allowed into the United States? Indeed let’s hear what Donald Trump would do about our porous open borders and the radical Muslim element that now proliferates American college campuses. How does Mr. Trump think the Muslim Brotherhood fits into our Founding Fathers’ model of a federal republic?

Donald Trump has announced with predictably great fanfare that he will be the jobs president Americans have not seen before. It will be useful to find out specifically how all those lost jobs the nation-building Bush/Cheney administration and the Marxist-tinged Obama crowd sent flooding to China will return to America.

Donald Trump will be able to speak forcefully on our tax code and why junking it and moving to a low and fair flat tax can produce thousands of high-paying jobs.  Trump has been an enormous business success and has not achieved his goals with a big government, open borders, income redistribution model practiced by the failed Obama administration model, never mind a foreign government influenced “charitable” foundation model now being promoted by Hilary Clinton.  And aren’t Americans fed up by even the voices and images of the Clinton/Bush gang plastered all over the media?

As Pat Buchanan tells Americans,

“Votes for Trump will be votes to reject a regime run by Bushes and Clintons that plunged us into unnecessary wars, cannot secure our borders, and negotiates trade deals that produced the largest trade deficits known to man and gutted a manufacturing base that was once ‘the great arsenal of democracy’ and envy of mankind.”

Trump says America is becoming a “ dumping ground” for mass immigration from the failed states of the Third World, that Mexico is not “ sending us her best and finest,” that China is stealing American jobs, that invading Iraq was a blunder.

If Trump wants to stake his claim as a different kind of Republican, he will go to Washington and pound the Boehner-McConnell Congress until it gives up on Obamatrade and fast track.”

>> read more
 
 
 
 
Copyright © 2015 Richardcyoung.com, all rights reserved.